Like Alexander hacking through the Gordian knot, Parfit wielded an analytical scalpel to divide personal identity from what matters in personal survival, reaching the conclusion that ordinary survival is about as bad as being destroyed and replaced by a replica. Robert Nozick was so impressed by the difficulties posed by fission cases that he decided personal identity must depend on extrinsic factors: you are identical to whatever person is your closest continuer at any future time, a thesis with the odd consequence that, if your closest continuer after fission dies, you may suddenly find yourself being someone who until that time was someone else, your second-closest continuer. Since there are two persons after fission, there were two all along, even though, before fission, they occupied the same body and were unaware of their duality. We are all the same person.
|Published (Last):||4 December 2005|
|PDF File Size:||16.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We assign to them tremendous significance. Along them we draw supposedly uncrossable boundaries within which we believe our individual identities begin and end, erecting the metaphysical dividing walls that enclose each one of us into numerically identical, numerically distinct, entities: persons. Do the borders between us - physical, Borders enclose and separate us. Do the borders between us - physical, psychological, neurological, causal, spatial, temporal, etc. The central thesis of I Am You is that our borders do not signify boundaries between persons.
We are all the same person. In presenting his arguments, the author relies on detailed analyses of recent formal work on personal identity, especially that of Derek Parfit, Sydney Shoemaker, Robert Nozick, David Wiggins, Daniel C. His development of the implied moral theory is inspired by, and draws on, Rawls, Sidgwick, Kant and again Parfit. The traditional, commonsense view that we are each a separate person numerically identical to ourselves over time, i.
The demonstration that personal identity is not closed but open points collectively in one of two new directions: either there are no continuously existing, self-identical persons over time in the sense ordinarily understood - the sort of view developed by philosophers as diverse as Buddha, Hume and most recently Derek Parfit, what the author calls Empty Individualism - or else you are everyone, i.
In making his case, the author: - offers a new explanation both of consciousness and of self-consciousness - constructs a new theory of Self - explains psychopathologies e. The book is intended for philosophers and the philosophically inclined - physicists, mathematicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, linguists, computer scientists, economists, and communication theorists.
It is accessible to graduate students and advanced undergraduates.
The rabbit-hour which begins at 8 am is not identical to the rabbit-hour which begins at 8: Along them we draw supposedly uncrossable boundaries within which we believe our individual identities begin and end, erecting the metaphysical dividing walls that enclose each oolak of us into numerically identical, numerically distinct, entities: The answer was amazingly simple. Many Minds, No Persons. The traditional, commonsense view that we are each a separate person numerically identical to ourselves over time, i. Daniel Kolak born in ZagrebCroatia is a Croatian -American philosopher aam works primarily in philosophy of mindpersonal identitycognitive sciencephilosophy of sciencephilosophy of mathematicsphilosophy of logicphilosophy of religionand aesthetics. He need not have feared a, here I am!
I AM YOU DANIEL KOLAK PDF
Tejar Even if we cannot remember our own names or a daniiel event that happened before we were institutionalized, even if everyone who visits is an unknown stranger, we fear that this experience, so unlike our present experience of competence, will be ours. There is at least one coherent and plausible example of a single person who has two spatially separated bodies at the same time. First, the path itself is if Kokak may say so myself extraordinarily beautiful. Kolak is a prolific philosopher, with over thirty-five authored books and nearly two hundred books edited. This way my kids can ride their bikes and go out directly in that cul-de-sac, but this was only part of my motivation.
I Am You: A Philosophical Explanation of the Possibility That We Are All the Same Person
I Am You: The Metaphysical Foundations for Global Ethics